United States v. Osborne

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Osborne. Read the opinion of the Court — 514 F.3d 377
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 29, 2009·No. 09-6093·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6093

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

AJAMU SAWANDI OSBORNE, a/k/a David K. Smith,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:98-cr-00322-JRS-1)

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 29, 2009

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ajamu Sawandi Osborne, Appellant Pro Se. Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ajamu Sawandi Osborne appeals the district court’s

order granting in part his 28 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Osborne, No. 3:98-cr-00322-JRS-1 (E.D.

Va. Oct. 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Osborne, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Osborne (United States v. Osborne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 3582
28 U.S.C. § 3582(c)