United States v. Orville Alvin Kozloski

453 F.2d 889, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6567
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 17, 1971
Docket71-2168
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 453 F.2d 889 (United States v. Orville Alvin Kozloski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Orville Alvin Kozloski, 453 F.2d 889, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6567 (9th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from a judgment of conviction of interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 2312. He contends that the District Court abused its discretion by refusing to grant his motion for severance and separate trial under Rule 14 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. At the hearing on his motion appellant argued, without the support of any evidence, that he would be prejudiced at trial by the generally poor quality of his codefendant as a witness and because a hostility had developed between the codefendant and himself. We find no abuse of discretion in denying the motion.

After the trial appellant filed a motion for new trial based in part on the allegation that he had indeed been prejudiced because of these factors. We find neither prejudice nor error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 F.2d 889, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-orville-alvin-kozloski-ca9-1971.