United States v. Ortiz-Gomez

251 F. App'x 932
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ortiz-Gomez. Read the opinion of the Court — 562 F.3d 683
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2007·No. 07-50391·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Marco Antonio Ortiz-Gomez has moved for *933 leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ortiz-Gomez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no non-frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *933 the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ortiz-Gomez, 251 F. App'x 932 (5th Cir. 2007).

251 F. App'x 932 (United States v. Ortiz-Gomez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)