United States v. Ortiz
76 M.J. 441, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 758
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided July 27, 2017·No. No. 16-0716/AR·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
CCA 20150267. On further consideration of the granted issue, 75 M.J. 494 (C.A.A.F. 2016), it is ordered that the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to the Court of Criminal Appeals for a new review under Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866 (2012), to evaluate the case in light of United States v. Hukill, 76 M.J. 219 (C.A.A.F. 2017).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Ortiz, 76 M.J. 441, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 758 (Ark. 2017).
76 M.J. 441 (United States v. Ortiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Sergeant First Class MANUEL ORTIZ, III
Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 2017