United States v. Ortega

536 F. App'x 335
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 30, 2013
DocketNo. 13-6577
StatusPublished

This text of 536 F. App'x 335 (United States v. Ortega) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ortega, 536 F. App'x 335 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jason Ortega appeals the. district court’s order denying his request for a copy of the sentencing transcript from his 1998 trial at government expense. Ortega currently has no motion to vacate pending, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013), and he is therefore not eligible for preparation of a transcript at government expense. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2006); United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 319, 96 S.Ct. 2086, 48 L.Ed.2d 666 (1976). Nor does Ortega’s motion for transcripts allege grounds sufficient to support the certification requirements of § 753(f). Therefore, although we grant Ortega leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his motion to appoint counsel and affirm the order below. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. MacCollom
426 U.S. 317 (Supreme Court, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
536 F. App'x 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ortega-ca4-2013.