United States v. Orsaris

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
• Decided: May 20, 2010
• Docket: 10-1261
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

10-1261-cr US v. Orsaris

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SUMMARY ORDER

R ULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT . C ITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER J ANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY F EDERAL R ULE OF A PPELLATE P ROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS C OURT ’ S L OCAL R ULE 32.1.1. W HEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS C OURT , A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE F EDERAL A PPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE ( WITH THE NOTATION “ SUMMARY ORDER ”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL .

At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on the 20 th day of May, two thousand and ten.

Present: AMALYA L. KEARSE, ROBERT D. SACK, RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges. ________________________________________________

UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee,

- v. - 10-1261-cr CHRIS ORSARIS,

Defendant-Appellant __________________________________________________

FOR APPELLANT: JOSEPH R. CONWAY, Mineola, NY.

FOR APPELLEE: BURTON T. RYAN, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney for Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, NY.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Wexler, J.).

1 UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, 1 AND DECREED that appellant’s motion for bail is hereby

2 DENIED.

3 4 FOR THE COURT: 5 Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk 6 7 8