United States v. Orrin Hernandez
This text of 473 F. App'x 625 (United States v. Orrin Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Orrin Eugene Hernandez appeals from the 37-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for assault resulting in serious bodily injury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153(a) and 113(a)(6). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Hernandez contends that the district court erred in imposing a two-level vulnerable victim enhancement. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing the enhancement. See U.S.S.G. § 3A1.1(b); United, States v. Rising Sun, 522 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (imposition of vulnerable victim enhancement is reviewed for abuse of discretion); United States v. Weischedel, 201 F.3d 1250, 1254-55 (9th Cir.2000) (to determine vulnerability, the court examines “personal traits of the victims and the specific circumstances in which the victims found themselves when the crimes were committed, and ask[s] whether there were any characteristics or circumstances that made the victims particularly susceptible to the crime”).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
473 F. App'x 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-orrin-hernandez-ca9-2012.