United States v. Orr

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Orr

298 F. App'x 276

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 28, 2008·No. No. 08-7109·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Richard A. Orr appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to correct errors in the Presentence Investigation Report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Orr, No. 2:00-cr10067-jpj-l (W.D.Va. June 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Richard A. Orr appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to correct errors in the Presentence Investigation Report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Orr, No. 2:00-cr10067-jpj-l (W.D.Va. June 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Orr, 298 F. App'x 276 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

298 F. App'x 276 (United States v. Orr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.