United States v. Orozco-Rangel

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 26, 2024
Docket23-50591
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Orozco-Rangel (United States v. Orozco-Rangel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Orozco-Rangel, (5th Cir. 2024).

Opinion

Case: 23-50591 Document: 44-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/26/2024

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-50591 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ March 26, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Manuel De Jesus Orozco-Rangel,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:20-CR-1860-1 ______________________________

Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Manuel De Jesus Orozco-Rangel pleaded guilty to illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Orozco-Rangel’s supervised release commenced on July 27, 2022. The probation officer filed a petition seeking to revoke his supervised release alleging that Orozco- Rangel violated the terms of his release by committing another crime and

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-50591 Document: 44-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/26/2024

No. 23-50591

reentering the United States illegally. The district court revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to 12 months in prison. We agree with Orozco-Rangel and the Government that there is a clerical error in the written order revoking supervised release. Orozco- Rangel pleaded true to the allegations in the petition to revoke supervised release. The written order, however, states that Orozco-Rangel pleaded not true to the same allegations. There is no other issue for appeal. Accordingly, this order is AFFIRMED in all other respects and REMANDED for the limited purpose of correcting the clerical error in the order. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36; United States v. Illies, 805 F.3d 607, 610 (5th Cir. 2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Michael Illies
805 F.3d 607 (Fifth Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Orozco-Rangel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-orozco-rangel-ca5-2024.