United States v. Orozco
This text of 69 F. App'x 583 (United States v. Orozco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jonathan Orozco pled guilty to an indictment charging him with conspiracy to distribute 5 or more kilograms of cocaine and 50 or more kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(A). Thereafter, he filed the instant appeal.
Counsel for Orozco has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) in which he claims that he has undertaken a conscientious review of the record and [584]*584that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Inasmuch as we agree that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal, we will affirm the judgment of the district court. Counsel’s motion to withdraw granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 F. App'x 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-orozco-ca3-2003.