United States v. Orozco

Third Circuit

United States v. Orozco

69 F. App'x 583

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 24, 2003·No. No. 02-2969·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

McKEE, Circuit Judge.

Jonathan Orozco pled guilty to an indictment charging him with conspiracy to distribute 5 or more kilograms of cocaine and 50 or more kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(A). Thereafter, he filed the instant appeal.

Counsel for Orozco has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) in which he claims that he has undertaken a conscientious review of the record and [584] that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Inasmuch as we agree that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal, we will affirm the judgment of the district court. Counsel’s motion to withdraw granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

McKEE, Circuit Judge.

Jonathan Orozco pled guilty to an indictment charging him with conspiracy to distribute 5 or more kilograms of cocaine and 50 or more kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(A). Thereafter, he filed the instant appeal.

Counsel for Orozco has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) in which he claims that he has undertaken a conscientious review of the record and [584] that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Inasmuch as we agree that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal, we will affirm the judgment of the district court. Counsel’s motion to withdraw granted.

United States v. Orozco, 69 F. App'x 583 (3d Cir. 2003).

Pincite

69 F. App'x 583 (United States v. Orozco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related