United States v. Orlando B. Pino, Joseph Ratti, George Hamilton

Second Circuit

United States v. Orlando B. Pino, Joseph Ratti, George Hamilton

185 F.2d 406

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedDecember 8, 1950

Docket21806

StatusPublished

This text of 185 F.2d 406 (United States v. Orlando B. Pino, Joseph Ratti, George Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Orlando B. Pino, Joseph Ratti, George Hamilton, 185 F.2d 406 (2d Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

185 F.2d 406

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Orlando B. PINO, Defendant-Appellant, Joseph Ratti, George
Hamilton, Defendants.

No. 93, Docket 21806.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued Dec. 8, 1950.
Decided Dec. 8, 1950.

Samuel Segal, New York City, for appellant.

Irving H. Saypol, U. S. Atty., New York City, for appellee.

Before L. HAND, Chief Judge, and SWAN and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed in open court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

185 F.2d 406

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Orlando B. PINO, Defendant-Appellant, Joseph Ratti, George
Hamilton, Defendants.

No. 93, Docket 21806.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued Dec. 8, 1950.
Decided Dec. 8, 1950.

Samuel Segal, New York City, for appellant.

Irving H. Saypol, U. S. Atty., New York City, for appellee.

Before L. HAND, Chief Judge, and SWAN and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed in open court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 F.2d 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-orlando-b-pino-joseph-ratti-george-ca2-1950.