United States v. Ore

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 18, 2000·No. 00-6231·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6231

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GERALDO ORE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-97-449, CA-99-629-AM)

Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Geraldo Ore, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Ellen Perkins, Special Assis- tant United States Attorney, Vincent J. Falvo, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Geraldo Ore seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Ore, Nos. CR-97-449; CA-99-629-AM

(E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ore, (4th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Ore (United States v. Ore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related