United States v. Onwuasoanya

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Onwuasoanya. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 F.3d 261
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 26, 2000·No. 00-20366·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20366 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ADIELE C. ONWUASOANYA,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-91-CR-218-1 -------------------- December 19, 2000 Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, CIRCUIT JUDGES.

PER CURIAM:*

In this direct criminal appeal, Adiele C. Onwuasoanya

complains that his guilty plea was involuntary because the district

court violated Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and the Due Process Clause of

the Fifth Amendment by misinforming him of the nature of the

conspiracy charge against him.

Our review of the record and the arguments and

authorities convinces us that no reversible error was committed.

The specific facts of the plea colloquy and record demonstrate that

any Rule 11 error in this case, if it occurred, was harmless error

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-20366 -2-

and that Onwuasoanya understood the charge against him. See United

States v. Reyna, 130 F.3d 104, 110-12 (5th Cir. 1997).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Onwuasoanya, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Onwuasoanya (United States v. Onwuasoanya) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Miguel Enrique Reyna
130 F.3d 104 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)