United States v. Ontarrio Veal
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
No. 23-11264
Non-Argument Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus ONTARRIO VEAL, a.k.a. Torrie,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 5:22-cr-00006-TES-CHW-1
2 Opinion of the Court 23-11264
Before ROSENBAUM, GRANT, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350–51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Boyd, 975 F.3d 1185, 1192 (11th Cir. 2020) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced where “it was clearly conveyed to the defendant that he was giving up his right to appeal under most circumstances” (quotation marks omitted, alterations adopted, emphasis in original)); United States v. Grinard- Henry, 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Ontarrio Veal (United States v. Ontarrio Veal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.