United States v. Onofre Arellano-Aguirre
This text of 76 F.3d 388 (United States v. Onofre Arellano-Aguirre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Onofre ARELLANO-AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-30024.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 23, 1996.*
Decided Jan. 26, 1996.
Before: ALARCON, HALL, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Onofre Arellano-Aguirre appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following his guilty plea to one count of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. His counsel submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Because our independent review of the record discloses no meritorious issues for review and no indication that the waiver of the right to appeal was invalid, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and dismiss the appeal.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 F.3d 388, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-onofre-arellano-aguirre-ca9-1996.