United States v. Onofre Arellano-Aguirre

76 F.3d 388, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7344
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 26, 1996
Docket17-71636
StatusUnpublished

This text of 76 F.3d 388 (United States v. Onofre Arellano-Aguirre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Onofre Arellano-Aguirre, 76 F.3d 388, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7344 (9th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

76 F.3d 388

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Onofre ARELLANO-AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-30024.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 23, 1996.*
Decided Jan. 26, 1996.

Before: ALARCON, HALL, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Onofre Arellano-Aguirre appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following his guilty plea to one count of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. His counsel submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Because our independent review of the record discloses no meritorious issues for review and no indication that the waiver of the right to appeal was invalid, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and dismiss the appeal.

DISMISSED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,039
76 F.3d 388 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 F.3d 388, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-onofre-arellano-aguirre-ca9-1996.