United States v. O'Neale
This text of 27 F. Cas. 237 (United States v. O'Neale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(nem. con.) at the prayer of Mr. Jones, instructed the jury, that if they should be satisfied by the evidence, that the traversers and others were combined to oppose the execution of the warrant, without knowing the nature of it, and actually assaulted one of the constable’s party before any assault had been made by any one of the constable’s party in attempting to execute the warrant, the traversers were guilty.
The jury found some of the traversers guilty, and others not guilty.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 F. Cas. 237, 2 D.C. 183, 2 Cranch 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-oneale-circtddc-1819.