United States v. O'Neal
This text of 8 C.M.A. 733 (United States v. O'Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court
We granted review to consider the sufficiency of the staff judge advocate’s post-trial advice to the general court-martial authority. The Government concedes error, and our examination of the record indicates that the concession is appropriate. The decision of the board of review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy for reference to a competent general court-martial authority for further proceedings in accordance with Articles 61, 64, and 65, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 861, 864, and 865. United States v Jenkins, 8 USCMA 274, 24 CMR 84; United States v Grice, 8 USCMA 166, 23 CMR 390.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 C.M.A. 733, 8 USCMA 733, 25 C.M.R. 237, 1958 CMA LEXIS 685, 1958 WL 3128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-oneal-cma-1958.