United States v. O'Neal

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 11, 2021·No. 18-51073·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 18-51073 Document: 00515702534 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2021

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED January 11, 2021 No. 18-51073 Lyle W. Cayce Conference Calendar Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Charles Brandon O’Neal,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:18-CR-183-4

Before Davis, Elrod, and Oldham, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Charles Brandon O’Neal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and supplemental brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). O’Neal has not filed a response. We

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 18-51073 Document: 00515702534 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/11/2021

No. 18-51073

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. O'Neal, (5th Cir. 2021).

United States v. O'Neal (United States v. O'Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)