United States v. One Toshiba Color Television Two Answering MacHines One Health Tech Computer, Reginald McGlory (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-Cv-00138) United States of America v. Assorted Jewelry, Reginald McGlory (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-00370)

183 F.3d 866
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 19, 1999·No. 98-3578·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

183 F.3d 866 (3rd Cir. 1999)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
ONE TOSHIBA COLOR TELEVISION; TWO ANSWERING MACHINES; ONE HEALTH TECH COMPUTER,
Reginald McGlory, Appellant
(Pursuant to Rule 12(a), F.R.A.P.)
(D.C. Civ. No. 90-cv-00138)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
ASSORTED JEWELRY, Reginald McGlory, Appellant
(Pursuant to Rule 12(a), F.R.A.P.)
(D.C. Civ. No. 90-00370)

NOS. 98-3578 and 98-3579

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Filed July 19, 1999

Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, MANSMANN GREENBERG, SCIRICA, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, McKEE, and RENDELL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Becker, CHIEF JUDGE

A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above appeals, it is

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court list the above cases for rehearing en banc at the convenience of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. One Toshiba Color Television Two Answering MacHines One Health Tech Computer, Reginald McGlory (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-Cv-00138) United States of America v. Assorted Jewelry, Reginald McGlory (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-00370), 183 F.3d 866 (3d Cir. 1999).

183 F.3d 866 (United States v. One Toshiba Color Television Two Answering MacHines One Health Tech Computer, Reginald McGlory (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-Cv-00138) United States of America v. Assorted Jewelry, Reginald McGlory (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-00370)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Reginald McGlory
202 F.3d 664 (Third Circuit, 2000)