United States v. One Thousand Cases

294 F. 1022, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2984
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 22, 1924
DocketNo. 3317
StatusPublished

This text of 294 F. 1022 (United States v. One Thousand Cases) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. One Thousand Cases, 294 F. 1022, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2984 (7th Cir. 1924).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This writ of error was prosecuted to review a judgment dismissing, for want of evidence, an action brought by the government, pursuant to section 10, Act of June 30, 1906 (federal Pood and Drugs Act [U. S. Comp. St. § 8726]), to condemn and forfeit one thousand cases of “Hall’s Hol-sum Brand” canned salmon. We have examined the evidence, and agree with counsel for plaintiff in error that the case should have been submitted to the jury. Applebaum v. United States of America (C. C. A.) 274 Fed. 43; Andersen v. United States (C. C. A.) 284 Fed. 642. The judgment is reversed, with direction to grant .a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applebaum v. United States
274 F. 43 (Seventh Circuit, 1921)
Schmidt & Zeigler, Ltd. v. Griffin Grocery Co.
284 F. 641 (Fifth Circuit, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
294 F. 1022, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-one-thousand-cases-ca7-1924.