United States v. One Fageol Truck

17 F.2d 373, 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 2951
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 7, 1927·No. No. 4518·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The libel or information in this ease is in the usual form, and, inasmuch as it does not appear from the record that the driver of the truck was prosecuted with effect, or at all, for transporting intoxicating liquor in violation of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. § 10138% et seq.), the libel states a cause of action for forfeiture under section 3450 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 6352). United States v. One Ford Coupé Automobile, 47 S. Ct. 154, 71 L. Ed.-, and Port Gardner Investment Co. v. United States, 47 S. Ct. 165, 71 L. Ed. -, decided by the Supreme Court, November 23, 1926.

The ruling of the court sustaining exceptions to the libel was therefore erroneous, and for this error the decree is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. One Fageol Truck, 17 F.2d 373, 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 2951 (9th Cir. 1927).

17 F.2d 373 (United States v. One Fageol Truck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related