United States v. One Assortment of 89 Firearms, National Rifle Association of America, Amicus Curiae

Fourth Circuit

United States v. One Assortment of 89 Firearms, National Rifle Association of America, Amicus Curiae

735 F.2d 794, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21792

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. One Assortment of 89 Firearms, National Rifle Association of America, Amicus Curiae. Read the opinion of the Court — 669 F.2d 206 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 6, 1984·No. 81-1055·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant has moved us to vacate our order of April 25, 1984 affirming the judgment of the district court. The ground of such motion is that we have not ruled upon appellant’s contentions that the district court was in error in finding that the claimant, Patrick Mulcahey, was engaged in the business of selling firearms and that the firearms seized on January 20, 1977, were the same firearms as those involved in the unlicensed firearms business.

Appellant is correct that a majority of the court has not ruled on these contentions. But we are agreed that the findings of the district court in these two regards were not clearly erroneous. Hence there is no reason to vacate our order.

MOTION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant has moved us to vacate our order of April 25, 1984 affirming the judgment of the district court. The ground of such motion is that we have not ruled upon appellant’s contentions that the district court was in error in finding that the claimant, Patrick Mulcahey, was engaged in the business of selling firearms and that the firearms seized on January 20, 1977, were the same firearms as those involved in the unlicensed firearms business.

Appellant is correct that a majority of the court has not ruled on these contentions. But we are agreed that the findings of the district court in these two regards were not clearly erroneous. Hence there is no reason to vacate our order.

MOTION DENIED.

United States v. One Assortment of 89 Firearms, National Rifle Association of America, Amicus Curiae, 735 F.2d 794, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21792 (4th Cir. 1984).

Pincite

735 F.2d 794 (United States v. One Assortment of 89 Firearms, National Rifle Association of America, Amicus Curiae) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.