United States v. One 1973 Rolls Royce
Opinion
Opinions of the United
1994 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
12-7-1994
United States v. One 1973 Rolls Royce Precedential or Non-Precedential:
Docket 93-1417
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1994
Recommended Citation "United States v. One 1973 Rolls Royce" (1994). 1994 Decisions. Paper 211. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1994/211
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1994 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
NO. 93-1417
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee
v.
ONE 1973 ROLLS ROYCE, V.I.N. SRH-16266, (by and through Claimant Oscar B. Goodman),
Appellant
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS,
Amicus-curiae
On Appeal From the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civ. No. 90-01487)
Argued: December 6, 1993
Before: BECKER, NYGAARD, and WEIS, Circuit Judges.
Opinion Filed: November 25, 1994
MICHAEL R. STILES
United States Attorney
WALTER S. BATTY, JR.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Chief of Appeals
JOEL M. FRIEDMAN
Assistant U.S. Attorney
FRANK A. LABOR, III (ARGUED)
Assistant U.S. Attorney
615 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Attorneys for Appellee
United States of America
DAVID CHESNOFF, ESQUIRE (ARGUED)
Goodman & Chesnoff
520 South Fourth Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
STEPHEN STEIN, ESQUIRE
520 South Fourth Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
ROBERT E. MURDOCK, ESQUIRE Murdock & Palazzo
520 South Fourth Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Attorneys for Appellant
One 1973 Rolls Royce
VIN SRH-16266
PETER GOLDBERGER, ESQ. (ARGUED)
50 Rittenhouse Place
Ardmore, PA 19003-2276
Attorney for Amicus-curiae National Association of
Criminal Defense Lawyers
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
The opinion in the above-captioned case filed November 25, 1994, is amended as follows:
1. On page 4, the beginning second sentence should read as follows:
Nicodemo Scarfo, Sr., a co-defendant of Goodman's former clients (and at one time . . .)
2. On page 9, first paragraph after Section IIA, the date should be January 1986.
3. On page 11, first full paragraph, delete the word "unexpected" on the first line. In the second paragraph, on the first line replace "Eventually" with "Meanwhile," and add the word "had" before convinced. In the last sentence, replace the phrase "counter-surveillance equipment" with "surveillance devices."
4. On page 29 within footnote 17, last paragraph, in penultimate sentence, add the word "absolute" before "Sixth Amendment."
5. On page 36, in the paragraph after the indentation, in the first sentence, replace "any one" with "either."
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edward R. Becker
Circuit Judge
DATED: December 7, l994
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. One 1973 Rolls Royce (United States v. One 1973 Rolls Royce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.