United States v. One 1951 Plymouth 4-Door Sedan

120 F. Supp. 451
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma
DecidedApril 1, 1954
DocketCiv. No. 5953
StatusPublished

This text of 120 F. Supp. 451 (United States v. One 1951 Plymouth 4-Door Sedan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. One 1951 Plymouth 4-Door Sedan, 120 F. Supp. 451 (W.D. Okla. 1954).

Opinion

WALLACE, District Judge.

The government filed a Libel of Information (and Warrant and Monition) against the defendant automobile and alleged that said automobile was used by its owner, Jack W. Woody, to deliver liquor at a time when said owner did not possess a retail liquor special tax stamp

as required by law. The intervenor, R. F. Campbell Finance Company,1 resists the government’s petition for forfeiture upon the basis that the owner of the defendant car did in fact hold a special tax stamp, even though the stamp carried the owner’s former business address.2

The sole issue in the instant case is whether the special tax stamp issued to Woody in July of 1952 for the business located at 1537 S.W. 41st Street, Oklahoma City, legalizes Woody’s operation at 1148 N. Robinson, Oklahoma City, the place of business of Woody at the time the defendant car was picked up by the federal officers.3

It is fundamental that where a retail dealer in liquor does business out of more than one location, a tax stamp must be obtained for each place of business;4 although, where a dealer moves his place of business he need not purchase a new stamp, if within thirty days from the time he opens for business at the new location he makes a proper application for transfer with the collector.5

[453]*453The statement given by Woody and .introduced into evidence indicates that Woody and his partner had been in the liquor business some three months prior to the time of the arrest in question on June 3, 1953; that they had first operated at 1829 NW. 6th Street and had subsequently (some three weeks prior to their arrest) moved to 1148 N. Robinson, their place of business at the time of their arrest.

Although a retail dealer in liquor can change his place of business and operate with impunity for thirty days where he is the owner of an unexpired special-tax stamp, he must within the thirty days after beginning business at the new location advise the collector of his change of address and have the new address endorsed on his special tax stamp or become liable for the tax as of the first day of the month in which he began business at the new location.6

Inasmuch as the owner of the defendant car had carried on the business of a retail liquor dealer at an address new and different from that shown on the issued special tax stamp for more than thirty days without obtaining a transfer of such tax stamp, as required by the regulation, such liquor operation was unlawful at the time the defendant car was used on May 28th and June 3rd in such business; and, such car is subject to forfeiture.7

Counsel should submit a journal entry to conform with this memorandum opinion within ten days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 3617
18 U.S.C. § 3617(b)(3)
§ 3116
26 U.S.C. § 3116
§ 3278
26 U.S.C. § 3278
§ 3280
26 U.S.C. § 3280

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 F. Supp. 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-one-1951-plymouth-4-door-sedan-okwd-1954.