United States v. One 1950 Ford Two-Door Sedan Automobile, Motor Number Holu 135780

200 F.2d 561
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 10, 1952·No. 11545·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case having been considered on the record, briefs and oral arguments of counsel for respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that the Findings of Fact of the District Judge are fully supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that his Conclusions of Law applicable thereto are not erroneous, Gambino v. United States, 275 U.S. 310, 48 S.Ct. 137, 72 L.Ed. 293; United States v. Butler, 10 Cir., 156 F.2d 897; United States v. Irwin, D.C.W.D.Ark., 86 F.Supp. 362;

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. One 1950 Ford Two-Door Sedan Automobile, Motor Number Holu 135780, 200 F.2d 561 (6th Cir. 1952).

200 F.2d 561 (United States v. One 1950 Ford Two-Door Sedan Automobile, Motor Number Holu 135780) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gambino v. United States
275 U.S. 310 (Supreme Court, 1928)
United States v. Butler
156 F.2d 897 (Tenth Circuit, 1946)
United States v. Irwin
86 F. Supp. 362 (W.D. Arkansas, 1949)