United States v. Ondilla

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Ondilla

271 F. App'x 863

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedMarch 27, 2008

DocketNo. 07-14058

StatusPublished

This text of 271 F. App'x 863 (United States v. Ondilla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Ondilla, 271 F. App'x 863 (11th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Danny Durham and Henry Crane, III, counsel for Robert Thomas Ondilla, have filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ondilla’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Danny Durham and Henry Crane, III, counsel for Robert Thomas Ondilla, have filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ondilla’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 F. App'x 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ondilla-ca11-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack