United States v. Ondilla
271 F. App'x 863
Opinion
Danny Durham and Henry Crane, III, counsel for Robert Thomas Ondilla, have filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ondilla’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Ondilla, 271 F. App'x 863 (11th Cir. 2008).
271 F. App'x 863 (United States v. Ondilla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)