United States v. O'Meara

Fourth Circuit

United States v. O'Meara

47 F. App'x 253

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 2, 2002·No. No. 01-4760·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kendrick O’Meara appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to revoke O’Meara’s conditional release and denying O’Meara’s motion that he be unconditionally released from both federal and state custody. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. O’Meara, No. CR-91-44 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kendrick O’Meara appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to revoke O’Meara’s conditional release and denying O’Meara’s motion that he be unconditionally released from both federal and state custody. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. O’Meara, No. CR-91-44 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. O'Meara, 47 F. App'x 253 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

47 F. App'x 253 (United States v. O'Meara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.