United States v. Omar Maria

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 3, 2018·No. 17-2533·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 17-2533

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Omar D. Maria

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

Submitted: March 27, 2018 Filed: April 3, 2018

[Unpublished]

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Omar Maria directly appeals the within-Guidelines-range sentence the district 1 court imposed upon revoking his supervised release. His counsel has moved for

1 The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief arguing that the sentence is substantively unreasonable.

After careful review of the record, this court concludes that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Maria. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009) (applying presumption of substantive reasonableness to revocation sentence within Guidelines range). The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Omar Maria, (8th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Omar Maria (United States v. Omar Maria) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Miller
557 F.3d 910 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Petreikis
551 F.3d 822 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)