United States v. Omar Clarence Phillips
This text of 286 F.2d 428 (United States v. Omar Clarence Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER.
The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court and the court being duly advised:
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad Company v. Turnipseed, Administrator, 219 U.S. 35, 31 S.Ct. 136, 55 L.Ed. 78; Hawes v. State of Georgia, 258 U.S. 1, 42 S.Ct. 204, 66 L.Ed. 431; Yee Hem v. United States, 268 U.S. 178, 45 S.Ct. 470, 69 L.Ed. 904; Casey v. United States, 276 U.S. 413, 48 S.Ct. 603, 72 L.Ed. 632; Morrison et al. v. California, 291 U.S. 82, 54 S.Ct. 281, 78 L.Ed. 664; Caudillo v. United States, 9 Cir., 253 F.2d 513.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 F.2d 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-omar-clarence-phillips-ca6-1960.