United States v. Ollie Peterson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ollie Peterson. Read the opinion of the Court — 711 F.3d 770
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided March 29, 2013·No. 12-2484·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

March 29, 2013

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellee, Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 12-2484 v. No. 11 CR 517 OLLIE PETERSON, Defendant-Appellant. James B. Zagel, Judge.

ORDER

The opinion issued in the above-entitled case on March 28, 2013, is hereby amended as follows:

On page 9, line 6, the second “to the” should be removed from the sentence.

The sentence should read: “There, we explained that the defendant could have raised his objection to the probation officer’s recommendation before sentencing, during the sentencing hearing, or in a post-sentencing motion.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ollie Peterson, (7th Cir. 2013).

United States v. Ollie Peterson (United States v. Ollie Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.