United States v. Oliver
Opinion
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Corey Oliver has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Oliver has filed a response seeking the appointment of sub[150]*150stitute counsel. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Oliver’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. Oliver’s request for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to-5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47Í5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
606 F. App'x 149 (United States v. Oliver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.