United States v. Olislager

305 F. App'x 66
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 15, 2008
DocketNo. 08-4193
StatusPublished

This text of 305 F. App'x 66 (United States v. Olislager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Olislager, 305 F. App'x 66 (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Richard Olislager appeals his forty-year sentence following a guilty plea to one [67]*67count of receiving child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2252(a)(2) (2006). The government concedes — and our review of the record confirms — that, by failing to make a recommendation that Olislager’s sentence not exceed 180 months, the government breached the terms of its plea agreement with Olislager. Accordingly, we remand to the district court for resentencing. We direct that a different district judge conduct the resentencing proceedings. See United States v. Peglera, 38 F.3d 412, 415 (4th Cir.1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
305 F. App'x 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-olislager-ca4-2008.