United States v. Olakunle Lanre Arigbede, A/K/A the Doctor, A/K/A Kunle

962 F.2d 7, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17300, 1992 WL 107437
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 21, 1992
Docket92-6218
StatusUnpublished

This text of 962 F.2d 7 (United States v. Olakunle Lanre Arigbede, A/K/A the Doctor, A/K/A Kunle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Olakunle Lanre Arigbede, A/K/A the Doctor, A/K/A Kunle, 962 F.2d 7, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17300, 1992 WL 107437 (4th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

962 F.2d 7

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Olakunle Lanre ARIGBEDE, a/k/a The Doctor, a/k/a Kunle,
Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-6218.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 4, 1992
Decided: May 21, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge. (CR-87-68-Y, CA-91-1257-Y)

Olakunle Lanre Arigbede, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Olakunle Lanre Arigbede appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Arigbede, Nos. CR-87-68-Y, CA-91-1257-Y (D. Md. Jan. 13, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Arigbede's motion for appointment of counsel is denied

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
962 F.2d 7, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17300, 1992 WL 107437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-olakunle-lanre-arigbede-aka-the-do-ca4-1992.