United States v. Oladokun
This text of United States v. Oladokun (United States v. Oladokun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6138
OLADAYO OLADOKUN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-3957-AW)
Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 9, 1998
Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oladayo Oladokun, Appellant Pro Se. Ranganath Manthripragada, Assistant United States Attorney, Jan Paul Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his
motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinions and find no reversible error. According-
ly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Oladokun, No. CA-97-3957-AW (D. Md. Jan. 5, 1998). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Oladokun, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-oladokun-ca4-1998.