United States v. Ohio
385 U.S. 9
Opinion
UNITED STATES
v.
OHIO.
Supreme Court of United States.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander and J. F. Bishop for the United States.
William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and Gerald A. Donahue, First Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U. S. 111.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Ohio, 385 U.S. 9 (1966).
385 U.S. 9 (United States v. Ohio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Perez v. United States
402 U.S. 146 (Supreme Court, 1971)
State of Maryland v. Wirtz
269 F. Supp. 826 (D. Maryland, 1967)