United States v. Ohio

385 U.S. 9
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 10, 1966·No. 271·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

385 U.S. 9 (1966)

UNITED STATES
v.
OHIO.

No. 271.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 10, 1966.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander and J. F. Bishop for the United States.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and Gerald A. Donahue, First Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U. S. 111.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ohio, 385 U.S. 9 (1966).

385 U.S. 9 (United States v. Ohio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perez v. United States
402 U.S. 146 (Supreme Court, 1971)
State of Maryland v. Wirtz
269 F. Supp. 826 (D. Maryland, 1967)