United States v. Ogletree
This text of 97 F. App'x 210 (United States v. Ogletree) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[211]*211MEMORANDUM
Fletcher Louis Ogletree, Jr. appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 151-month sentence for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Ogletree has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No supplemental pro se brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the appeal is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 F. App'x 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ogletree-ca9-2004.