United States v. Oechsle

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Oechsle

358 F. App'x 417

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 28, 2009·No. No. 09-7663·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Thomas Oechsle, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Oechsle, No. 5:94-cr-00057-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. July 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. We deny the motion to order officials to make copies, provide paper and envelopes, and allow access to law books.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Thomas Oechsle, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Oechsle, No. 5:94-cr-00057-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. July 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. We deny the motion to order officials to make copies, provide paper and envelopes, and allow access to law books.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Oechsle, 358 F. App'x 417 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

358 F. App'x 417 (United States v. Oechsle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.