United States v. O'Dowd

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
• Decided: January 28, 2004
• Docket: 03-20442
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 28, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-20442 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

JOHN WINSTON O’DOWD,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-02-CR-168-ALL --------------------

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for appellant John Winston O’Dowd

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). O’Dowd has filed a

response and a motion for appointment of new counsel.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, O’Dowd’s motion for appointment

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-20442 -2-

of counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.