United States v. Odman

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 14, 2008
Docket08-6528
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Odman (United States v. Odman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Odman, (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6528

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

OWEN ODMAN, a/k/a Charles Llewelyn,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (4:96-cr-00053-LHT-1; 1:04-cv-00044-LHT)

Submitted: October 15, 2008 Decided: November 14, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Owen Odman, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Owen Odman appeals the district court’s order granting

in part and denying in part relief from a pre-filing injunction.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Odman, No. 4:96-cr-00053-LHT-1

(W.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Odman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-odman-ca4-2008.