United States v. Odman

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Odman

300 F. App'x 188

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 14, 2008·No. No. 08-6528·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Owen Odman appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part relief from a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Odman, No. 4:96-cr-00053-LHT-l, 2008 WL 706607 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Owen Odman appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part relief from a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Odman, No. 4:96-cr-00053-LHT-l, 2008 WL 706607 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Odman, 300 F. App'x 188 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

300 F. App'x 188 (United States v. Odman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.