United States v. Oden

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Oden

620 F. App'x 181

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2015·No. No. 15-7006·Published

Opinion

[182] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher William Oden appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for a sentence reduction and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Oden, No. 3:11-cr-00056-GMG-RWT-1 (N.D.W.Va., Mar. 30, 2015; May 26, 2015). We deny Oden’s motion for resentencing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[182] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher William Oden appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for a sentence reduction and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Oden, No. 3:11-cr-00056-GMG-RWT-1 (N.D.W.Va., Mar. 30, 2015; May 26, 2015). We deny Oden’s motion for resentencing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Oden, 620 F. App'x 181 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

620 F. App'x 181 (United States v. Oden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.