United States v. O'Connor

76 M.J. 52, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 1041
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided December 22, 2016·No. No. 17-0093/AR·Published

Opinion

CCA 20130853. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues:

I. WHETHER THE APPOINTMENT OF JUDGES PAULETTE V. BURTON AND JAMES W. HERRING AS CMCR JUDGES MEANT THAT THEY NO LONGER MET THE UCMJ DEFINITION OF APPELLATE MILITARY JUDGE.
II. WHETHER THE ASSIGNMENT OF INFERIOR AND PRINCIPAL OFFICERS TO A SINGLE TRIBUNAL VIOLATED THE APPOINTMENTS CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION.

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. O'Connor, 76 M.J. 52, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 1041 (Ark. 2016).

76 M.J. 52 (United States v. O'Connor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.