United States v. Ochoa-Ramirez
This text of 314 F. App'x 87 (United States v. Ochoa-Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Tomas Ochoa-Ramirez appeals from the 96-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(ii)(II), and 846, and conspiracy to import and importation of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a), 960(a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(ii), and 963. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Ochoa-Ramirez contends that the district court erred by denying his request for a mitigating role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). We conclude that the district court did not clearly err. See United States v. Cantrell, 433 F.3d 1269, 1282-83 (9th Cir.2006); see also United States v. Murillo, 255 F.3d 1169, 1179 (9th Cir.2001).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
314 F. App'x 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ochoa-ramirez-ca9-2009.