United States v. Ochoa

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ochoa. Read the opinion of the Court — 88 F. App'x 40
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 30, 2002·No. 02-10060·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10060 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUIS SAMUEL OCHOA,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:00-CR-486-1-M -------------------- December 27, 2002

Before DAVIS, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Luis Samuel Ochoa has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ochoa has filed a pro se

response. Our independent review of counsel’s Anders brief,

Ochoa’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, Ochoa’s motions for the appointment of substitute counsel

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-10060 -2-

and to supplement the record on appeal are DENIED, and the appeal

is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ochoa, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Ochoa (United States v. Ochoa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)