United States v. O'Brien

Ninth Circuit

United States v. O'Brien

77 F.2d 1019, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4854

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 17, 1935

DocketNo. 7759

StatusPublished

This text of 77 F.2d 1019 (United States v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. O'Brien, 77 F.2d 1019, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4854 (9th Cir. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon motion of counsel for appellee confessing error herein and for reversal of the judgment of the District Court herein and remanding of the cause for a new trial, upon authority of White v. U. S. A., 77 F.(2d) 757, decided by this court May 20, 1935, No. 7245, it is ordered that said motion be granted, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court issued forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon motion of counsel for appellee confessing error herein and for reversal of the judgment of the District Court herein and remanding of the cause for a new trial, upon authority of White v. U. S. A., 77 F.(2d) 757, decided by this court May 20, 1935, No. 7245, it is ordered that said motion be granted, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court issued forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 F.2d 1019, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-obrien-ca9-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack