United States v. O'Brien

Second Circuit

United States v. O'Brien

163 F. 1022, 89 C.C.A. 664, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4607

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 20, 1908·No. No. 269·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts are the same as when these cases were here before. Our former opinion was filed January 7, 1908. 159 Fed.. 671. Upon the second trial the government amended the complaints by reducing the amount of its claims. This enabled defendants to include among the grounds upon which they moved for direction of verdict in their favor the following: “The government having retained the penalty, -which it was authorized to retain, has [1023] exercised the sole and exclusive and entire right it had under the terms of the contract.” The decision of the trial judge in granting this motion was in accord with the opinion of a majority of this court as indicated in the former opinion. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The facts are the same as when these cases were here before. Our former opinion was filed January 7, 1908. 159 Fed.. 671. Upon the second trial the government amended the complaints by reducing the amount of its claims. This enabled defendants to include among the grounds upon which they moved for direction of verdict in their favor the following: “The government having retained the penalty, -which it was authorized to retain, has [1023] exercised the sole and exclusive and entire right it had under the terms of the contract.” The decision of the trial judge in granting this motion was in accord with the opinion of a majority of this court as indicated in the former opinion. Judgment affirmed.

United States v. O'Brien, 163 F. 1022, 89 C.C.A. 664, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4607 (2d Cir. 1908).

Pincite

163 F. 1022 (United States v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.