United States v. Nunez-Rodriguez
This text of 28 F. App'x 340 (United States v. Nunez-Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pedro Nunez-Rodriguez appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. We decline to review Nunez Rodriguez’s claims raised for the first time on appeal. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993). We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Nunez-Rodriguez, Nos. CR-98-121; CA-01-211-1 (E.D.Va. July 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 F. App'x 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nunez-rodriguez-ca4-2002.