United States v. Nunez

330 F. App'x 241
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 26, 2009·No. No. 09-1024-cr·Published

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendant-appellant Nunez appeals from the district court’s order of detention pending trial. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, the proceedings below, and the issues on appeal. The district court concluded that Nunez posed a risk of flight and that no condition or combination of conditions could reasonably assure his presence at trial. Upon careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court properly considered and weighed the applicable factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3142, and that its findings were not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Sabhnani, 493 F.3d 63, 75 (2d Cir.2007) (“[W]e apply deferential review to a district court’s order of detention and will not reverse except for clear error....”).

For the reasons discussed, the order of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Nunez, 330 F. App'x 241 (2d Cir. 2009).

330 F. App'x 241 (United States v. Nunez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Sabhnani
493 F.3d 63 (Second Circuit, 2007)