United States v. Nozario

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Nozario

403 F. App'x 789

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 1, 2010·No. No. 10-7045·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nemecio Benitez Nozario appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion, and his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. [790]*790United States v. Nozario, No. 5:06-cr-00285-F-3 (E.D.N.C. June 24 & July 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nemecio Benitez Nozario appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion, and his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. [790]*790United States v. Nozario, No. 5:06-cr-00285-F-3 (E.D.N.C. June 24 & July 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Nozario, 403 F. App'x 789 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

403 F. App'x 789 (United States v. Nozario) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.