United States v. Novak
457 F.3d 981, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 19299, 2006 WL 2241521
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 1, 2006·No. No. 04-55838·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth [982]*982Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Novak, 457 F.3d 981, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 19299, 2006 WL 2241521 (9th Cir. 2006).
457 F.3d 981 (United States v. Novak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Raymond P. Novak
476 F.3d 1041 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Novak
Ninth Circuit, 2007