United States v. Novak

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 8, 2006·No. 04-40953·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT March 8, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40953 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH NOVAK,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-35-1 --------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Joseph Novak has moved to

withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of

counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Novak, (5th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Novak (United States v. Novak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)